The Ultimate Stealth Tax: Inflation

InflationWith all the talk about tax rates and the fiscal cliff, hardly anyone has mentioned what is probably the most effective and least understood tax in the federal arsenal: inflation.

Wait a minute. Isn’t it confusing to call inflation a tax?

It is. That confusion is exactly why inflation is the ultimate stealth tax.

One of the few deficit-reducing measures that has the support of both parties and President Obama is a change in the way the government measures inflation. Our lawmakers have agreed on another in a series of adjustments to the way they calculate the consumer price index (CPI). The proposed changes will understate the future CPI even more than the current formula already does.

This maneuver is a brilliant way for deficit-reducing lawmakers to both cut spending and increase taxes, without calling their action either a spending cut or a tax increase.

How is this possible? First, here’s a brief explanation of the proposed change, which is called the chained Consumer Price Index. According to an AP article published in the Rapid City Journal on December 5, 2012, “the chained CPI assumes that as prices rise, consumers turn to lower-cost alternatives, reducing the amount of inflation they experience.”

The assumption is that, if the price of pork rises while chicken doesn’t, people will buy more chicken. Yet they’re still buying protein. Therefore, presto—no inflation has happened. This argument is like saying if the price of gasoline goes up and the cost of walking doesn’t, people will just walk more, so there’s no problem.

The chained CPI is a spending cut because many entitlement programs are indexed to the CPI. These include Social Security, government pensions, veterans benefits, and the interest on some of the national debt. The lower the increase in the CPI, the less benefits will rise.

The AP estimates that once the new CPI is fully phased in, a 65-year old on Social Security will receive $136 a year less. At age 75 the reduction will be $560 annually, and at 85 it will be $984 less.

In addition, as wages increase at the real inflation rate, entitlement programs won’t keep pace. Gradually, fewer people will be eligible for programs like food stamps, Medicaid, heating allowances, and Head Start.

The chained CPI is a tax increase for much the same reason. Many income tax brackets and deductions are indexed to inflation. Smaller annual adjustments to the brackets because of the lower CPI will push more people into higher tax brackets.

Tweaking the CPI is nothing new. Politicians from both parties have done so for years to give the illusion of a lower CPI than that calculated by previous methods.

ShadowStats.com, run by John Williams, calculates the current unemployment and inflation rates using the formulas from the 1980s. According to that methodology, the unemployment rate (U-6) is 15% and the CPI is 9%. Yet the government has tweaked the CPI so much that today the official CPI is 2.5%. Under this newest proposal, inflation would be 2.2%.

You may think understating the current CPI by 0.3% isn’t any big deal, but it is. The decrease represents a 12% drop in the inflation rate, which understates the increase in our cost of living. If your employer reduced your wages by 12%, you’d probably see it as a big deal.

Proponents figure the newest CPI adjustment will save $200 billion in spending increases and raise $65 billion in new taxes over ten years. It doesn’t matter whether you call it inflation, chained CPI, or plain old gimmickry. A tax increase by any other name is still a tax increase.

Rick Kahler

 

Rick Kahler is a Certified Financial Planner, President of Kahler Financial Group, author of the “Financial Awakening” blog, and a featured contributor on the CIF Blog.

8 early warning signs inflation is percolating

BOSTON (MarketWatch) — They don’t ring a bell at the top of a bull market nor at the bottom of a bear market. But when it comes to inflation there are some early warning signs that investors can monitor, according to a new report.

Inflation is relatively low at the moment. But two risks — some type of shock or monetary policy mistake — could potentially spur “significant and sustained increases in inflation,” according to Michael Hood, a strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management and author of “Managing Inflation.”

And, thankfully, Hood said in an interview and in his report that there are “eight early warning signs to monitor that will detect growing imbalances that could ultimately lead to upward pressure on prices.”

As a group, Hood said the indicators — ranging from surveys that track inflation expectations and labor-market dynamics to indexes that track and capture global trends in available resources — are flashing green, suggesting there is little cause for concern.

Still, there’s nothing quite like a little heads up, especially given how easy it is to monitor the indicators that Hood says are worth watching.

In his report, Hood gave color-coded ranges for investors to track each of the indicators, with numbers in the green range being safe, numbers in the yellow range being worrisome and numbers in the red range being, well, trouble. Read Hood’s full report, Managing Inflation.

“We tried to give investors ranges that will tip them off to when things might become problematic,” he said. “The idea was to give people information that they could work with themselves.”

When watching for inflation, Hood said investors shouldn’t focus on any one indicator. But should four of the eight indicators enter the yellow or red zones that would be cause for concern.

“We always caution people not to try to find the one magical indicator you can rely on to the exclusion of all others because any one series, however reliable and quality it is, can get pushed around by specific factors,” said Hood. “And so what you are looking for is the weight of evidence. So, if you start to see a number of things, and four is as good a number as any, start to move that’s probably time to question your pre-existing view.”

So, without further delay, here’s a look at the eight indicators Hood recommends watching:

1. 5y5y forward inflation breakeven

According to Hood, the Fed’s preferred market-based measure of inflation expectations is the “breakeven” rate, or the distance between real interest rates in the TIPS market and nominal interest rates on regular U.S. Treasurys. The Fed watches this rate, according to the report, as a gauge of medium-term expectations.

The breakeven rate has averaged 2.7% since 2000, which is slightly higher than the Fed’s 2% inflation target, according to Hood.

Anything below 3% is — in the main — good. But a sustained move significantly above 2.7% — say, to 3% or higher — would signal a possible anchoring of inflation expectations in the market, with a rise above 3.3% putting this indicator in the red, Hood wrote.

The breakeven rate has ticked up from 2.5% when Hood first published his report in August to 2.7% in the wake of the Federal Reserve announcing QE3 two weeks ago. But that’s not a cause for concern yet. “The breakevens are not high by any long-term standards, and they don’t show any signs of becoming unanchored,” Hood said.

2. Long-term inflation expectations from the University of Michigan consumer survey

The monthly consumer confidence survey conducted by the University of Michigan includes short- and long-term inflation expectations, according to Hood. And that means it captures forecasts made by average Americans.

Oil uncertainty keeps prices volatile

Oil prices are likely to remain volatile over the next year, analysts say,

Since 2000, the number has averaged 2.9%, but a move to the 3.2% area that lasts for six months or more would suggest “that expectations are coming unglued, with readings of 3.6% or higher generating even more concern,” according to Hood.

3. Employment cost index

In order for a true inflationary process to become entrenched in the economy, wage growth needs to participate, said Hood. Thus, tracking wage increase is an essential component of inflation-watching.

And the index to watch is the Employment Cost Index (ECI). Though published only quarterly it is broad in its coverage and includes benefit costs along with wages.

The ECI, which stands roughly at 2%, would need to “accelerate to a 3.5%-4.25% pace before triggering significant concern,” Hood wrote.

Any measure of wage inflation is really not showing anything much,” said Hood. Even the trend with the average hourly earnings report which is published monthly is “quite meager,” said Hood.

Inflation could spike up for any number of reasons, but unless it winds up affecting the labor market, it’s very likely to dissipate quickly, said Hood.

4. The Fed’s long-run forecast for the unemployment rate

The Federal Open Market Committee each quarter forecasts various economic variables, including the long-run unemployment rate. “The longer run unemployment rate can be taken as an estimate of a ‘neutral jobless rate’ which is defined as the level of joblessness consistent with stable inflation,” according to Hood.

If the estimate goes up, it’s a signal that the economy has less spare capacity than previously thought, Hood wrote. On the other hand, Hood wrote, if the neutral unemployment rate is higher than the Fed’s estimate some fear that the Fed will maintain easy policies for too long.

To be fair, economists understand that the neutral jobless rate is less stable than once was thought, but “investors should still monitor the relationship between the actual unemployment rate, the Fed’s neutral-rate estimate, and other indicators of market slack for signs that pressure is building,” Hood wrote.

“At the moment, with unemployment at 8%, compared with the Fed’s long-run jobless rate projection of 5.2%-6%, there seems little doubt that the labor market is operating with significant spare capacity,” according to Hood.

“You can argue about whether something has structurally changed in labor markets since the recession,” said Hood. “How much capacity has been destroyed there? Whether the labor market is going to take a long time to function efficiently? But even if you quibble with the Fed’s estimate of where the neutral unemployment rate would be, it’s pretty hard to dispute that there is a lot of slack back in the labor market.”

5. ISM nonmanufacturing survey prices component

Central banks, according to Hood, pay extra attention to inflation in services. The notion being that services inflation is most susceptible to influence by domestic growth and monetary developments, Hood said.

Hood also noted that the ISM nonmanufacturing survey, which is published monthly, should be watched less for a particular level and more for a large and sustained increase. That would trigger concern, he said.

At the moment, the ISM which had ticked up, “remains below its six-moth earlier level, consistent with an ‘all-clear’ signal for now,” according to Hood.

“It’s leveled off, but you can think about what would tend to drive that,” Hood said. “That’s likely to be related to capacity pressures. If you think about services inflation, this is not the goods price inflation gets pushed around by things like oil and grains; this is in a sense another check on whether the economy is operating with some degree of slack. What’s going to drive inflation in the services sector comes back in significant degree to labor.”

6. Overall commodity prices

The last three indicators capture global trends, and relate to pressure on available resources, according to Hood. And broad measures of commodity prices are one window into those dynamics, he wrote.

Hood said no one commodity is perfect so it’s best to look at trends in three or four high-profile indices, including the Thomson Reuters/Jefferies CRB index and the J.P. Morgan Commodity Curve Index. “At the moment, commodity indices are signaling little or no pressure on global prices,” Hood said.

To get a sense of whether inflation is on the rise here, look at the year-over-year percent change in the CRB index using a 12-month moving average. Anything above 20% would be cause for concern, and anything above 40% would really be cause for concern. Hood, for the record, cautioned investors against over focusing on commodity price indices when watching for inflation.

7. The Baltic Dry index

Container Ship Leaving Port of Los Angeles

It’s not every day you get to bring up the Baltic Dry index, which tracks global shipping costs, in conversation at the soccer field. But this indicator is well worth watching too, said Hood.

The Baltic Dry index a real-time reading on trade activity and thus the relationship of economic growth and available resources. And it tends to capture inflection points in the global cycle, according to Hood.

“This is a good global indicator,” said Hood. “It’s one that is correlated with global trade activity, because it’s shipping costs. Global trade activity is highly correlated with overall global growth. And so this is an indicator of when global growth is bumping up against capacity constraints. If there are literally not enough ships to go around to carry the goods that are being imported and exported around the world, then the price of shipping will go up and that will be an early indicator that, in general, the global economy is straining against its speed limit.”

The Baltic Dry index has stabilized since is early 2012 plunge but remains far below its 2011 average, said Hood.

When watching for inflation, look at the year-over-year index change. Anything less than 3,000 is good; anything between 3,000 and 5,000 is in the yellow zone; and any reading above 5,000 is time to sound the red-zone alarm.

8. Chinese renminbi (CNY)

“In addition to its small but direct influence on inflation in the U.S. and elsewhere, movements in the CNY can serve as a summary measure of China’s role in the world as well as of the global economy itself,” Hood wrote in his report. “CNY appreciation will occur when Chinese policy makers feel comfortable with both international and local economic conditions — circumstances more likely to generate pressure on inflation.”

At the moment, the CNY is depreciating.

So there you have it. You don’t need to worry about inflation — at least according to Hood’s indicators — for the time being. Even better, you can now set up your own station to watch for signs of inflation on the horizon.

Robert Powell

 

Robert Powell is a featured writer on the MarketWatch Retirement blog, a Research Fellow at the California Institute of Finance, and  a Featured Contributor here on the CIF blog.

Inflation or deflation? Be ready for either

BOSTON (MarketWatch)—Neither an inflationist nor a deflationist be. That, to mangle one well-known quote, sums up the view of some investment professionals who are struggling to make sense of current market conditions.

“We are not currently forecasting a global deflationary environment, but rather an environment where subdued economic growth results in contained inflationary pressure,” said Jeff Witt, director of research at Private Asset Management, Inc. “This view is somewhat contrary to the markets bipolar assessment that we are either going into an inflationary or deflationary spiral.”

According to Witt, the extreme views on
inflation stem from the push and pull of various economic conditions prevalent in the global economy. “First, central banks around the world, most notably the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank, have dramatically increased their balance sheets and the money supply in their respective economies—which is traditionally inflationary.”

The counter balance to this inflationary pressure, however, is the deleveraging in these economies, which Witt said, “results in excess liquidity not being circulated back into the economy and thus having relatively little inflationary impact.”

Another factor pointing to inflation is the rise of consumerism in several emerging markets, which, Witt said, “is driving up the demand for goods and commodities, especially energy and food, which again would be inflationary.”

But the increased consumption in those regions is being offset by austerity in larger, more developed markets, Witt said.

>“Therefore, we believe that there is still some risk of deflation, but it will likely be regional and not global,” said Witt.

That being said, the risk of a global deflationary spiral cannot be ignored.

David Rosenberg, the chief economist for the Canadian money manager Gluskin Sheffis, spoke in February about an underlying trend of deflation that, along with other factors, spell trouble.

Read Rosenberg’s point of view on deflation.

And this week, Robert Doll of BlackRock expressed concern that “the global risks of deflation are still present.”

Monitor the threat of deflation

Given the risk of deflation, Witt said one has “continually monitor for the threat.”

One way to monitor for global deflationary risk, said Witt, is to look at those investments that would likely
outperform in such an environment, most notably sovereign debt. “Recall that, all things equal, fixed-income becomes more valuable in a deflationary environment because future cash flows are no longer being discounted by inflation, thereby increasing the present value of the revenue stream,” said Witt. “Given the immense size of the Treasury market relative to the entire sovereign debt market, Treasuries can provide a good indication of the risk of a global deflationary spiral.”

At Witt’s investment firm, for instance, they check for a significant increase in demand for Treasuries, which, he said, results in pushing market rates down materially. “Note that this occurred in the height of the financial crisis in late 2008, where there was a real risk of a global deflationary spiral, in our opinion,” he said. “Recently rates have been moving lower, on concerns over the European sovereign debt crisis, but the contraction is nowhere near what we saw in 2008.”

Witt
is also monitoring the TIPS Spread, which is the interest differential between traditional Treasuries and TIPS, and is considered as a gauge of inflation expectation. “Here again we saw a significant downward move in the TIPS spread in late 2008, but this pattern has not re-emerged, and therefore, we are not currently forecasting a significant risk of global deflation,” said Witt.

What’s more, Witt said there are signs that the labor market in the U.S. is gradually improving. Plus, there’s been a general increase in unit labor costs among OECD, or Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, countries. “Both of these economic improvements should further mitigate the risk that the world is falling into a deflationary spiral,” Witt said.

Equities over bonds if inflation

Given that his firm’s outlook calls for low inflation and gradual economic growth, Witt favors equity investments over fixed-income securities. “Should this outlook be
correct, we believe that market interest rates will gradually increase over the next few years, which will be a headwind for fixed-income securities,” said Witt. “Equities, which tend to outperform in a low interest rate environment, should be able to capitalize on the gradual economic improvement, however, we monitoring significant macroeconomic uncertainties, specifically in Europe.”

In addition, Witt said a “cyclical bias to a portfolio is warranted.”

Bonds and dividend-paying stocks if deflation

If we should fall into a deflationary environment, Witt said “debt becomes more attractive to investors; however, it becomes harder to service for borrowers.”

“If we were to see indications of a deflationary spiral, we would recommend increasing exposure to fixed-income investments, but would stay with investment-grade securities and would avoid TIPS and variable-rate debt.”

In addition, Witt said dividend-paying
stocks become more attractive since the dividend income stream is no longer being discounted by inflation. “Within equities, we would look for companies that have a history of paying and increasing their dividend and that have pricing power,” he said. “The latter is important to evaluate to insure that the deflationary environment will not inhibit the company’s ability to maintain and/or increase their dividends going forward.”

Visit California Lutheran University’s Website to learn more about our MBA In Financial Planning.

Robert Powell

 

Robert Powell is a featured writer on the MarketWatch Retirement blog, a Research Fellow at the California Institute of Finance, and  a Featured Contributor here on the “Advisor Blog”